‍

CONTEXT

‍

ICON. Amsterdam is a premium men's fashion brand built around a clear and focused proposition: refined essentials for men who move with intention. Rooted in Amsterdam and operating across Europe and beyond, the brand offers a curated range of clothing - from tailored trousers and outerwear to activewear and footwear - designed around fit, quality, and purpose.

‍

Generating over €25M in annual revenue, ICON. Amsterdam operates on a pure direct-to-consumer model, where Google Ads functions as one of the primary engines behind customer acquisition and revenue growth across all active markets.

‍

With its primary markets in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, and the United Kingdom, ICON. Amsterdam made the strategic decision to rebrand - retaining the name while overhauling its visual identity and sharpening the ideology behind the brand to reflect a more elevated and intentional direction. The goal was to deliver a stronger, more consistent brand experience to their customers across every touchpoint.

‍

For a brand operating at this scale, a rebrand carries real commercial risk. Beyond the creative work, the transition had to be executed across live campaigns, active product feeds, and multiple Google Merchant Centers - simultaneously, across four markets. The core challenge was not just managing the change, but protecting performance throughout it. A poorly handled transition can disrupt Shopping eligibility, fragment audience signals built over time, and trigger performance drops that are difficult to recover from quickly. Getting this right required both operational precision and a clear strategic framework from day one. 

‍

APPROACH

‍

‍Phase 1: Preparation (Several Weeks Before the Change)‍

‍

For a brand generating over €25M in annual revenue, there is no room for improvisation. A rebrand of this magnitude - spanning four markets, multiple Merchant Centers, and hundreds of active ads - requires every detail to be prepared, reviewed, and ready before a single change goes live. The goal of this phase was simple: eliminate the risk of mistakes by doing the hard work in advance.‍

‍

Ad Copy‍

‍

Before anything changed publicly, all ad copy was rewritten from scratch. The new brand direction called for a different kind of language - cleaner, more confident, and aimed at a more premium-minded customer. This was not just a tone adjustment. It also reflected a shift in who the brand was speaking to. Every ad, across every campaign and every market, was drafted, reviewed, and approved during this phase - so that on the day of the transition, there was nothing left to write and no room for inconsistency.‍

‍

Product Selection‍

‍

The rebrand also brought a sharper focus to the product catalog. Products that no longer fit the new brand direction were identified and flagged for deprioritization. New and repositioned SKUs were validated in the feed and made ready for launch. This work was done weeks in advance so that the moment the rebrand went live, Shopping campaigns were already aligned with the new direction - serving the right products to the right audience from day one.‍

‍

Creative Assets

‍

All visual assets - Shopping feed images, Performance Max creatives, display banners - were updated to reflect the new brand identity and staged for deployment. Running a mix of old and new imagery, even for a day, was not acceptable for a brand at this level. Every asset was prepared, approved, and ready to go before the transition window opened.

‍

‍Phase 2: The 24-Hour Switch‍

‍

All the preparation from the weeks prior came down to this. Within a single day, every active touchpoint across all markets was transitioned to reflect the new brand - simultaneously, with no overlap between old and new. This is where the planning paid off.‍

‍

Merchant Centers‍

‍

Every Google Merchant Center across all active markets was updated in the same coordinated push. Feed attributes, product titles, descriptions, and structured data were all realigned with the new brandbook and updated product selection. Inconsistencies between what the brand communicated and what appeared in Shopping results would have created both a quality signal problem and a brand perception problem - neither was acceptable.

‍

The product feed was restructured from the ground up using DataFeedWatch - one of the most capable feed management platforms available - giving the team full control over every attribute across the entire catalog.‍

‍

Logo & Visual Identity‍

‍

The logo was swapped across all campaigns and assets on the same day. Every creative that had been prepared and staged in the weeks prior went live as part of the same push - ensuring that the visual transition was clean, complete, and consistent across all markets from the first moment the new brand was public.‍

‍

New Collections‍

‍

The rebrand coincided with the launch of new collections, which were introduced to the market through dedicated campaigns built specifically around the new product range. Rather than folding new products into existing campaign structures, standalone campaigns were created to give the new collections focused budget, clean data, and messaging that reflected the updated brand direction from day one.‍

‍

Ad Copy & Branded Search‍

‍

All new ad copy went live as part of the transition - the weeks of preparation meant there was nothing to write on the day, only to deploy. Branded search campaigns were fully restructured at the same time, with ad groups reorganised to separate "icon" searches from "icon amsterdam" searches. This allowed for more precise control over messaging and bidding at the query level, while also producing cleaner performance data going forward - making it easier to distinguish between brand awareness and direct brand intent across markets.‍

‍

RESULTS - FIRST MONTH AFTER THE REBRAND‍

‍

The numbers from the first month following the transition made one thing clear: a well-executed rebrand does not have to cost performance. It can accelerate it.

‍

‍

Revenue nearly doubled compared to the pre-rebrand period, with purchases up +88% and conversion rate improving by +43%. Spend scaled significantly, yet ROAS held firm - demonstrating that the structural work done before and during the transition created a stable and efficient foundation to grow from.

‍

‍‍

Branded vs. Prospecting‍

‍

One of the clearest signals from the first month was the health of both sides of the account.

‍

‍

‍

Branded performance was exceptionally strong, with a 20.6 ROAS and over €728K in revenue - a direct reflection of the rebrand landing well with the existing customer base. The new identity clearly resonated, driving stronger engagement and purchase intent from people already familiar with the brand.

‍

On the prospecting side, the account generated €329.74K in revenue at a 3.90 ROAS - a +5.69% improvement over the previous period. With a CPA of €27.26 and nearly 3,100 new purchases, the campaigns were acquiring new customers efficiently, even in the immediate aftermath of a major brand transition. This is where many accounts lose ground during a rebrand - audience signals fragment, creative consistency breaks down, and performance dips. None of that happened here.‍

‍

Geographic Performance

‍

‍

‍

The Netherlands remained the strongest market by volume, generating €566K in revenue on a 7.84 ROAS with purchases nearly doubling (+97%). Germany was the standout performer in terms of efficiency and growth rate - revenue up +123% with a 10.99 ROAS and CPA improving by -11%, showing that the new brand positioning resonated particularly strongly in that market. 

‍

‍

‍

Belgium also responded well, with revenue up +64% and ROAS improving by +7%. The UK, Austria, and US, all smaller or more nascent markets for the brand, saw ROAS decline during the transition as the new positioning was still being calibrated for those audiences. Notably, all three still grew in spend and the UK and Austria grew in revenue, suggesting early demand signals that are expected to strengthen as the updated brand identity gains traction in those regions. The US, representing less than 2% of total spend, remains in an early testing phase.

‍

KEY TAKEAWAY

‍

Rebranding at scale is a high-stakes operation. The risk of losing performance during the transition is real - disrupted audience signals, inconsistent creative, misaligned feeds, and outdated messaging can all compound quickly across multiple markets. The results from this first month show what becomes possible when the transition is treated as a strategic and operational project, not just a creative one. With the right preparation, the right structure, and clean execution, a rebrand can be a growth event rather than a disruption.